Legal Opinion

Beckner v. Riverside & Battle Ground Turnpike Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Complaint, by appellee, against the appellants, to collect a stock subscription.

Demurrer to the complaint for want of facts; but, before the demurrer was decided, the appellants answered :

1. By a general denial;

2 and 3. Special paragraphs.

Demurrer for want of facts, to the second paragraph of answer, sustained, and demurrer for want of facts, to third paragraph, overruled.

Reply to third paragraph. Trial by jury, and verdict for appellee. By a motion for a new trial and assignments of error, the appellants have presented four questions for our consideration:

1. The overruling of the demurrer to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Hynds v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. New Albany & Salem Railroad v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Steinmetz v. WingateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. JolleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Cravens v. Eagle Cotton Mills Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Moore v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Gipe v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Maglaris v. Claude Neon Federal Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API