Legal Opinion

First Alabama Bank of Montgomery v. Adams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 25, 1980No. 78-323, 78-408 and 78-408XPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"No interest is good unless it must vest, if at all, not later than twenty-one years after some life in being at the creation of the interest."

Most lawyers will immediately recognize this as the statement of the Rule against Perpetuities, which, when read, seems simple enough; but, when applied, has confounded lawyers, judges and law students for ages. In fact, one law professor, in an article entitled "Perpetuities in a Nutshell" observed:

"We school teachers have delighted to make a mystery of the Rule against Perpetuities. We love to tell the old, old story of its tangled history; we love…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fitchie v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Lyons v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Henderson v. Troy Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Garrison v. GraysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. Hudgens v. TillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Estate of Elbert B. Whitt, Loyd Whitt v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N. A. v. CokerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Pierce v. RummellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Earle v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Dial v. DialSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API