Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Rummell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 21, 1988No. 86-1377, 86-1378, 86-1527 and 86-1528PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment for Shirley Pierce against Charles ("Charlie") and Beth Pierce for conspiring to defraud Shirley. The jury returned a $60,000 verdict for Shirley, and the trial court entered judgment on the verdict. Charlie and Beth raise issues regarding denial of their motions for a mistrial, directed verdict, judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and new trial; those motions raised, among other issues, res judicata, collateral estoppel, and the statute of limitations. Beth also appeals from the denial of her motion for new trial on her claim against Shirley on a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lott v. ToomeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Von HadenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Cammorata v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  5. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dairyland Ins. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Equity Resources Management, Inc. v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. McMillian v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
  4. Jones v. BlantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. IMAC Energy, Inc. v. TittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API