Legal Opinion

Hudgens v. Tillman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1933No. 4 Div. 727PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The shares of stock in the mill corporation were duly surrendered to it and reissued in the name of this appellee and would be effective as an irrevocable gift had there been a delivery of the new certificate actual or constructive, and which is the chief question to be determined upon this appeal.

As we understand, section 6995 of the Code of 1923 is not the only method of transfering corporate stock as between the parties, nor does a compliance therewith dispense with the necessity for a delivery to become effective as a valid gift. Davis v. Wachter, 224 Ala. 306, 140…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. WachterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Cannon v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Getchell v. Biddeford Savings BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1900
  4. McGowin v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bush v. CrowtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Figuers v. SherrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In Re Declaration of Trust by BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. De Mouy v. JepsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Buffaloe v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API