Legal Opinion

Sperando v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1994No. Petition 638 E.D. Allocatur Docket 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Order of the Commonwealth Court, 157 Pa.Cmwlth. 531, 630 A.2d 532, is reversed on the basis of this Court’s opinion in Kapres v. Heller, 536 Pa. 551, 640 A.2d 888 (1994). The Order of the- trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Mark Mullin is hereby reinstated. Jurisdiction of this Court is relinquished.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kapres v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Sperando v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Welc v. PorterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Cicardo v. Mangual, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2015