Blakeslee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff, while driving a team attached to a load of barrels on a narrow street, turned his team upon the track of the defendant’s trolley road, to pass a carriage standing by the roadside. As the front wheel of the wagon was brought upon or near to the westerly fail of the track, the load was struck upon the side, near the front, by defendant’s car, whereupon the plaintiff’s team ran away, and he was Injured. He recovered a verdict in an action for negligence, and the defendant has appealed. The principal questions raised arise over the claims of defendant’s counsel that (1),…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McGee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rouse v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Young v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Tunison v. WeadockMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- McCormick v. Ottumwa Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Snider v. New Orleans & Carrollton RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.