Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 3, 1972No. 72-1162PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Appellant Joseph Taylor was convicted of selling stolen motor vehicles in viola tion of 18 U.S.C. § 2313. After the jury had been discharged, the presiding judge became ill and was unable to rule on appellant’s motions for a new trial or for a judgment of acquittal. Pursuant to Rule 25(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a new judge ruled on these motions. United States v. Taylor, 334 F.Supp. 1050 (E.D.Pa.1971). Appellant now presents eleven grounds for reversal, nine of which were dealt with by the district court. For the reasons given therein, we affirm the…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Matthew J. Connelly and T. Lamar Caudle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Albert N. Dukow, Appeal of Thomas S. Crow. Appeal of Saul BrourmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Cyril J. NiederbergerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. KulpDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. Thomas Jefferson McCallieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. AldermanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.