United States v. Albert N. Dukow, Appeal of Thomas S. Crow. Appeal of Saul Brourman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Crow and Brourman, 1 following a jury trial, were convicted on two counts of a nine count indictment charging violations of various portions of the federal securities laws. While they do not complain that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict or that there was reversible error in the course of the trial, Crow and Brourman argue that their motions to dismiss the indictment should have been granted because of a violation of F.R.Crim.P. 48(b), their Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial, and their Fifth Amendment due process…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
3Cited by39 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- United States v. BoffaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.