Legal Opinion

State v. . Freeman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

That a party cannot discredit his own witness is a well-settled rule of evidence in judicial procedure in this State. Strudwick v. Brodnax, 83 N. C., 401; S. v. Taylor, 88 N. C., 694; Gadsby v. Dyer, 91 N. C., 312; McDonald v. Carson, 94 N. C., 497; Chester v. Wilhelm, 111 N. C., 314, 16 S. E., 229; S. v. Mace, 118 N. C., 1244, 24 S. E., 798; Smith v. R. R., 147 N. C., 603, 61 S. E., 575; Lynch v. Veneer Co., 169 N. C., 169, 85 S. E., 289; Worth Co. v. Feed Co., 172 N. C., 335, 90 S. E., 295; S. v. Melvin, 194 N. C., 394, 139 S. E., 762; Clay v. Connor, 198 N. C., 200, 151 S. E., 257; S. v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDonald v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. State v. . CohoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. State v. . MacESupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. State v. . MelvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. State v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API