Legal Opinion

Ethetton v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 2006No. 26614PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

Citing part of Missouri’s Implied Consent Law, specifically section 577.041.3, Missouri’s Director of Revenue (“Director”) revoked the license of John William Ethetton (“Ethetton”) to operate a motor vehicle. 1 Director based the revocation on Ethetton’s refusal to submit to a chemical test of his breath pursuant to section 577.020.1, RSMo Cum.Supp.2001.

Ethetton petitioned the circuit court for review of Director’s decision, per section 577.041.4. After an evidentiary hearing, the court entered a judgment that set aside the revocation and ordered Ethet-ton’s license…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Hinnah v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Berry v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. Jarrell v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. McCabe v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chad Nicholas Ayler v. Director of Revenue, State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Edwards v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Warren v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API