Legal Opinion
Prater v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 16, 2003No. 3:02CV7530PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is an FELA case in which the plaintiff claims to have incurred a variety musculoskeletal injuries as a result of repetitive stresses while working as a car-man for Conrail and its successor, CSX Transportation.
Pending are a motion to reconsider and nine motions in limine filed by the defendant and plaintiffs motion in limine regarding collateral source benefits. The following sets forth my rulings on those motions.
1. Defendant’s motion to reconsider the order granting plaintiff’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of defendant’s expert Dr. Howard Sandler…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gary W. Hardyman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company Norfolk Southern Railway Company Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jesse A. Fielden v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Mohney v. USA Hockey, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Leo v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Hewitt v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. GardnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.