Legal Opinion
Peelers Company v. Wendt
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 29, 1966No. 2350, 2797PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
BOLDT, District Judge.
Eleven claims for treble damages, all grounded on the same alleged Sherman Act violations, were asserted in these cases. The claims were made by the several plaintiffs in Cause #2797 and, as a counterclaim in Cause #2350, by the defendants Wendt and Sutterlin, co-partners. All of the claims in Cause #2797 were asserted against Peelers Company, a partnership, and its individual members. In Cause #2350 Laitram Corporation, successor in interest to the Peelers partnership, was named, duly served with process and participated in the proceedings as a party.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Usm Corporation v. Sps Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Michael W. Callahan v. A.E.V., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Mason-Rust, a Joint Venture v. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Local 42Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- La Salle Street Press, Inc. v. McCormick and Henderson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.