Legal Opinion

Ardizzonne v. Archer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1916No. 7438PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckenridge, Judge. Action by Leroy Archer, by his guardian against Joseph Ardizzonne and another, to recover certain rentals under an oil and gas mining lease. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BURFORD, C.

This was an •action instituted by Leroy Archer, a minor, ■by John W. Archer, his legal guardian, to recover from the defendants certain rentals claimed to be due under an (il and gas mining lease. It was alleged in the petition, and appeared from the undisputed evidence, that John W. Archer, as guardian, under order of the county court of Tulsa county, sold an «oil and gas mining lease covering the lands «of his minor ward; that at said sale one Braun was the purchaser: that the form of lease was submitted to the county court, and the sale and the lease approved by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duff v. KeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Winona Oil Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Gross v. LincolnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Oklahoma Petroleum & Gasoline Co. v. WinshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Central States Production Corp. v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Fife v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API