Legal Opinion

Gross v. Lincoln

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 29, 1921No. 10089PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action in replevin by Ora A. Lincoln and R. L. Lincoln against M. C. Gross and J. E. McCristy. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This is an action in re-plevin, brought in the district coul-t of Garfield county by Ora A. Lincoln and R. L. Lincoln, as plaintiffs, against M. C. Gross and J. E. McCristy, defendants, to recover the possession of one Eord automobile of which the plaintiffs claim to be the owners, or the sum ■ of $400, the value thereof; in case a delivery cannot be ■ had. The cause was tried to a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiffs for a return of said automobile, or for its value in the sum of $400, upon which verdict judgment was rendered, and to reverse which this proceeding in error…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. CobbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Osmers v. FureyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Kernodle v. ElderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & FraterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Pierce v. EngelkemeierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Beard v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. General Finance Corporation v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Hutchings v. WinsorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Oklahoma Petroleum & Gasoline Co. v. WinshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Mitchell v. DadasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API