Legal Opinion

Fife v. Adair

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1935No. 22503PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

On the 30th day of August, 1930, Hattie Adair filed her petition in district court of Muskogee county, Okla., against Exie Fife, seeking to recover $80,-000 as damages, and $25,000 as punitive damages for the alienation of her husband’s affections.

This cause was tried to a jury on the 24th day of March, 1931, and a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Hattie Adair, and against the defendant, Exie Fife, in the sum of $15,000 damages, and $5,000 exemplary damages.

Motion for new trial was duly filed by the defendant, Exie Fife, overruled by the trial court, and said cause appealed to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Mary Lee Coal & Railway Co. v. ChamblissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. City of Shawnee v. SlankardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Johnson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oller v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Basden v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Moore v. Target Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Basye v. HayesIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Grand River Dam Authority v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API