Legal Opinion

Monahan v. Brahm

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 28, 1975No. FILE No. 11Published

1Opinion of the CourtSpeziale, J.

The defendant Richard W. Brahm 1 contracted with the plaintiff for the performance of carpentry services on the home in which he and his wife, the defendant Arlou E. Brahm, had vested interests. The plaintiff proceeded to perform those services. The defendant became dissatisfied with the plaintiff’s work and hired one Mr. Kirk, assessment investigator of the town of Greenwich, to inspect the work of the plaintiff and his carpenters. Mr. Kirk presented a list of twenty defects in the construction of the house to the defendant, who then terminated his contract with the plaintiff. The defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. Hutensky v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. City of New Haven v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. Bell v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. Porter v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API