Legal Opinion

Bell v. Strong

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 21, 1921PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Action by a real-estate broker to recover a commission for effecting an alleged sale of the defendants’ premises, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Fairfield County, Haines, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendants, and appeal by the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.

This appeal comes to this court under the provisions of § 5832 of the General Statutes. There are thirty-four assignments of error. In twenty-four of these the plaintiff claims that the court erred in not finding “as a fact” each of twenty-four paragraphs of his draft-finding. In four others he claims that the court erred in finding “as a fact” three paragraphs which appear in the finding and in its memorandum of decision. He has caused the evidence and rulings in the case to be made a part of the record on this appeal. He asks this court to try again on this printed record the issues of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosenfield v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. Murphy v. LinskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Seward v. M. Seward & Son Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Johnson v. ShufordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Plum Trees Lime Co. v. KeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Dexter Yarn Co. v. American Fabrics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Greenwich Gas Co. v. TuthillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. Moeur v. Farm Builders Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Todd v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API