Legal Opinion
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 6, 2015No. Slip Op. 15-71; Court 12-00020PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Senior Judge:
This action is again before the court following a fourth remand and redetermi-nation. 1 - The only issue remaining for review is the antidumping (“AD”) duty rate assigned to one separate rate respondent — Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd., (“Changzhou Hawd” or “Plaintiff’). 2
Previously, in the second and partial third redeterminations, the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) had, belatedly, sought to individually investigate Chang-zhou Hawd. 3 However, this decision was challenged as 4 and found to be arbitrary and capricious. Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017