Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1983No. 8230DC319PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

G.S. 50-8 states in part: “In all actions for divorce the complaint shall be verified in accordance with the provisions of Rule 11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and G.S. 1-148.” The defendant argues that this requirement was not satisfied when the plaintiff verified his complaint after it was filed but before it was served upon the defendant.

G.S. 1-148 requires verification before certain persons, e.g., a notary public, before it will be valid. This factor is not contested by the defendant.

Instead, the defendant contends that the verification requirements of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re T.R.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. ESTATE OF LIVESAY EX REL. MORLEY v. LivesayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. In Re TRPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Gaskill v. State ex rel. CobeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API