Boyd v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
G.S. 50-8 states in part: “In all actions for divorce the complaint shall be verified in accordance with the provisions of Rule 11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and G.S. 1-148.” The defendant argues that this requirement was not satisfied when the plaintiff verified his complaint after it was filed but before it was served upon the defendant.
G.S. 1-148 requires verification before certain persons, e.g., a notary public, before it will be valid. This factor is not contested by the defendant.
Instead, the defendant contends that the verification requirements of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re T.R.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- ESTATE OF LIVESAY EX REL. MORLEY v. LivesayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- In Re TRPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Gaskill v. State ex rel. CobeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.