Gaskill v. State ex rel. Cobey
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCRODDEN, Judge.
Respondent contends that the trial court erred by reversing the final decision of OAH finding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the petition for a contested case. In ruling on this contention, we must decide whether petitioner met the requirements for commencing a contested case hearing which are found at N.C.G.S. § 113A-126(d)(3) of CAMA and N.C.G.S. § 150B-23(a) of the APA. We hold that he did not, and we reverse the Superior Court’s decision.
In order to commence a contested case, petitioner must follow the requirements in CAMA. That Act requires that a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lewis v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Gummels v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Smith v. Daniels InternationalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Rudisill v. IcenhourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989