Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Food Lion, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 11, 2006No. 26235PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MOORE:
Petitioners, who are mother and son, filed suit against respondent (Food Lion), alleging causes of action for assault, battery, outrage, premises liability, negligence, and negligence per se. The trial court granted Food Lion’s motion for a directed verdict as to most of petitioners’ claims. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Food Lion as to the negligence claim. The Court of Appeals affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR. Armstrong v. Food Lion, Inc., Op. No.2004-UP-366 (S.C. Ct.App. filed June 10, 2004). We affirm.
FACTS
Petitioner Ronnie Armstrong (Ronnie) went to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Jinks Ex Rel. Estate of Jinks v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Crittenden v. Thompson-Walker Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Lane v. Modern Music, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Jones v. ElbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nucor Corp. v. BellDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2008
- Kase v. EbertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Pridgen v. WardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Park v. SOUTHEAST SERVICE CORP.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- Arellano v. Cedar Fair, L.P.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.