Park v. SOUTHEAST SERVICE CORP.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Southeast Service Corporation, moves to dismiss Plaintiff Sarah Park’s claims for negligent entrustment, wrongful intrusion into private affairs, and outrage. For the foregoing reasons, the court grants Defendant’s motion in part and denies it in part.
BACKGROUND
In late 2008, an employee at E.L. Wright Middle School discovered a hidden video camera in one of the school’s faculty lounges, which was positioned to record female employees of the school using the restroom. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Adam Ostrzenski, M.D. v. Mark S. Seigel, M.D., Adam Ostrzenski, M.D. v. Mark S. Seigel, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Snakenberg v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Lane v. Modern Music, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arnette v. Limestone CollegeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Doe 1 v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
- Wadford v. CooperDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024