Legal Opinion

Barber v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1982No. 45076PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Gary Barber, the movant-appellant, was convicted by a jury of one count of operating a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner, two counts of second-degree burglary and stealing. He received two, five year and two, ten year concurrent sentences and one consecutive five year sentence. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Barber, 587 S.W.2d 325 (Mo.App.1979).

*181The movant contends on this appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion without an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Sweazea v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. State v. BarberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Barton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stokes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Bolder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Spencer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Luster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Irving v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API