Legal Opinion

Luster v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1990No. 16832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

Appellant Eddie Guy Luster brings this appeal from an order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion per Rule 24.035, Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure (20th ed. 1989), to vacate his conviction of selling marihuana, § 195.020, RSMo 1986, and eight-year prison sentence. The conviction resulted from a plea of guilty.

Appellant presents three points relied on. The first reads:

“The motion court clearly erred in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, appellant’s motion for postconviction relief under Rule 24.035 because his motion pleaded facts not refuted by the record…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Sloan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. Boggs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. StatlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. Short v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Barton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Trehan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Depriest v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API