Rubenstein v. Collins
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOYT, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the United States Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation, signed on June 27, 1995, it is
ORDERED that said Recommendation be and the same is hereby adopted as the Court’s Memorandum and Order. It is therefore
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiffs’ Motion To Certify Class Action (#50) is GRANTED.
The Clerk shall enter this Order.
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS
BOTLEY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion To Certify Class Action (#50). After reviewing the pleadings and evidence, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lehocky v. Tidel Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
- In Re Waste Management, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
- Kalodner v. Michaels Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
- Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Dynegy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- Hamilton v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.