Legal Opinion
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Dynegy, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 3, 2005No. CIV.A.H-02-1571PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAKE, District Judge.
This action is brought against Dynegy, Inc. (DI) and others for violation of federal securities law. Pending before the court is Lead Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification for the 1933 Act and 1934 Act Claims (Docket Entry No. 413), in which Lead Plaintiff seeks certification for two classes. The first class consists of persons seeking relief for alleged violations of §§ 11 and 15 of the Securities *268Act of 1933 (1933 Act), 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k and 77o, during a proposed class period beginning on December 20, 2001, and ending on July 22, 2002.1 The…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re SchmitzTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- In re Gentiva Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Chesapeake Energy Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
- In re Salomon Analyst Metromedia LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.