Legal Opinion
Madery v. International Sound Technicians
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 20, 1978No. CV 77-4340-AAHPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HAUK, District Judge.
This matter arises upon plaintiff’s “Motion to Amend and Supplement Complaint” and came on regularly for hearing on July 17, 1978. After considering this motion, all other pleadings filed in this case, including a “Stipulation Re Nonopposition To Plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Complaint,” and all relevant principles of law, the Court, for the reasons specified below, hereby, despite the parties’ stipulation, denies the plaintiff’s “Motion To Amend and Supplement Complaint.”
I. BACKGROUND
This is a sex discrimination in employment case.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Karen Jean Hymer v. Benjamin K. Chal and Victoria Leilani ChaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Patricia A. Lyon v. James A. Whisman Whisman & Associates, P.A., Patricia A. Lyon v. James A. Whisman Whisman & Associates, P.A. James A. Whisman, Jr., Whisman & Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. American Metal Exchange Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Frye v. Pioneer Logging MacHinery, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
- Lyon v. WhismanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Klupt v. Blue Island Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.