Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1909No. 15,624PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Franklin county: Ed L. Adams, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This is an action for negligence. Three causes of action are set forth in the petition. The first is for damages caused by fire negligently started by an engine on defendant’s right of way, which burned about ten acres of alfalfa belonging to the plaintiff, the second is for similarly burning some hay and fence, and the third cause of action is for damages to certain fields of corn in the years 1908, 1904 and 1905, respectively, which it is alleged were occasioned by successive floods caused by the negligent manner of construction of the railroad embankment by which flood waters were held…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. HarlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Morse v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Berard v. Atchison & Nebraska RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Fremont, E. & M. V. R. v. CrumNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Beck v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hopper v. Elkhorn Valley Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Staub v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Marron v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Adam v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API