Legal Opinion

National Crane Corp. v. Ohio Steel Tube Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1983No. 81-747PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

This is an action under various tort and contract theories to recover all or a portion of the cost of conducting a retrofit program to replace all steel tubing manufactured and sold by the defendant to plaintiff and incorporated into cranes manufactured and sold to ultimate users or consumers by the plaintiff. The District Court sustained defendant’s demurrers and dismissed plaintiff’s petitions. The plaintiff has appealed.

The plaintiff, National Crane Corporation, is a Nebraska corporation which manufactures and sells a diversified line of cranes. The defendant, Ohio Steel Tube Company, is…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hawkins Construction Co. v. Matthews Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Star Furniture Co. v. Pulaski Furniture Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Alfred N. Koplin & Co. v. Chrysler Corp., Airtemp DivisionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Morris v. Chrysler Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Compaq Computer Corp. v. LaprayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Nebraska Plastics, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Holland Colors Americas, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Ritter v. Custom Chemicides, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API