Legal Opinion

Alfred N. Koplin & Co. v. Chrysler Corp., Airtemp Division

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 10, 1977No. 75-260PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GUILD

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant Chrysler Corporation Airtemp Division appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff, Alfred N. Koplin & Co., Inc., entered upon a jury verdict in an action for damages resulting from the breakdown and failure of two air conditioning units manufactured by Chrysler. We conclude that the jury verdict is, on this record, not sustainable on the basis of breach of warranty because an express warranty by its terms both excluded liability and included a valid disclaimer of warranty. We also resolve an issue of first impression in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Berish v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API