Alfred N. Koplin & Co. v. Chrysler Corp., Airtemp Division
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GUILD
delivered the opinion of the court:
Defendant Chrysler Corporation Airtemp Division appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff, Alfred N. Koplin & Co., Inc., entered upon a jury verdict in an action for damages resulting from the breakdown and failure of two air conditioning units manufactured by Chrysler. We conclude that the jury verdict is, on this record, not sustainable on the basis of breach of warranty because an express warranty by its terms both excluded liability and included a valid disclaimer of warranty. We also resolve an issue of first impression in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Berish v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.