McInnish v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Alabama
1ConcurrenceBolin, Justice
I concur with this Court’s no-opinion affirmance of this case. However, I write specially because I respectfully disagree with Chief Justice Moore’s dissent to the extent that it concludes that the Secretary of State presently has an affirmative duty to investigate the qualifications of a candidate for President of the United States of America before printing that candidate’s name on the general-election ballot in this State. I fully agree with the desired result; however, I do not agree that Alabama presently has a defined means to obtain it.2
Initially, Chief Justice Moore addresses certain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bush v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Keyes v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Ex Parte GrubbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- In Re Nomination Paper of NaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.