Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzalez

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 2003No. C-020384PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} We affirm defendant-appellant Nader Gonzalez’s conviction on two counts of felonious assault for his failure to disclose to a sexual partner his knowledge that he was HIV-positive. 1 This new manner of committing felonious assault was added in 2000. Gonzalez’s crimes are second-degree felonies, and the trial court sentenced him to the maximum term of 16 years in prison.

{¶ 2} Gonzalez contends that the statute under which he was convicted is unconstitutional, and that the trial court committed myriad errors. We hold the statute constitutional and hold that the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DuncanOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Turk v. OilerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  3. State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. CarnicomOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API