Legal Opinion
Kalo v. Moen Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 28, 2000No. 1:00CV0063PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
Dan Kalo, the plaintiff, sued his former employer, Moen Incorporated (“Moen”), in the Court of Common Pleas in Lorain County, Ohio. Kalo alleges that Moen wrongfully terminated him in violation of (1) Ohio law prohibiting age discrimination; (2) Ohio law prohibiting disability discrimination; and (3) Ohio public policy disfavoring termination for the purposes of preventing an employee’s receipt of medical, pension, and other benefits. Moen removed the case to federal court on the ground that Kalo’s claims are completely preempted by the Employee…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Robert Warner v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- National Management Ass'n v. Transamerica Financial Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Vargas v. Child Development Council of Franklin County, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Graf v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Harris v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.