Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Harris v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 16, 2000No. 00-72963, 00-72964, 00-72965, 00-72966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Each of the above captioned cases was filed with identical amended complaints. The first case, Denise Harris v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, has been chosen as the lead case for the purpose of this opinion and order.

The plaintiff Denise Harris (Harris) filed a complaint in the Wayne County Circuit Court alleging she was wrongfully discharged by her employer, the defendant Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (MichCon). She then amended her complaint, changing the allegations of wrongful discharge to age discrimination. .She states…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. David Rice v. Kanu Panchal, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, P.C., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schultz v. TRIBUNE ND, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  2. Ruby v. Sandia Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API