Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clements Farms, Inc. v. Ben Fish & Son

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1991No. 19047Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

PART I.

Narrowing down the factual scenario as portrayed in the Court’s opinion to those necessary for a determination, there exists no reason for including Shields Seed Company. The legal relationship here pertinent involves only two parties and culminated in the signing of a written agreement entered into by only those two entities, Clements Farms, Inc., an Idaho corporation, and Ben Fish & Son, which may or may not have been incorporated. The contents of the *191written agreement, titled “Bean Contract,” of May 29, 1985, spelled out the terms agreed upon, and those determine the exact nature of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Heckman Ranches, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public LandsIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ross v. Coleman Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Glenn Dick Equipment Co. v. Galey Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Casey v. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API