Legal Opinion

Heroux v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1939No. L. A. No. 17126PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in a collision between an automobile and a locomotive. From a judgment on a verdict the defendants appealed. The judgment was reversed by the District Court of Appeal on September 8, 1938. (Heroux v. Atchison, Topeka & S. F. Ry. Co., 28 Cal. App. (2d) 401 [82 Pac. (2d) 620].) No application for a rehearing in that court was made. A petition for a hearing in this court was denied November 7, and on November 9, 1938, the remittitur went down from the District Court of Appeal. On December *28624, 1938, a notice of motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haydel v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Heroux v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southwestern Investment Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Lelande v. PeopleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Heroux v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. In Re LA County Pioneer SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Southwestern Investment Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API