Petter Investments, Inc. v. Hydro Engineering, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.
I. Background
This case is the latest chapter in the parties’ battle for sales over wash fluid containment systems. Plaintiff, Petter Investments, Inc. (“Petter”), and Defendants, Hydro Engineering, Inc. and Hydro Engineering Equipment & Supply Co. (collectively “Hydro”), are competitors in the design, manufacture, installation, and sale of wash fluid containment systems for pressure washing large vehicles such as automobiles, bulldozers, and semi-trucks. These systems incorporate a pad upon which the vehicle is placed for washing.
The dispute dates back…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ocean Tomo, LLC v. BarneyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015