Legal Opinion

Gene Coburn v. City of Manchester, NH

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided September 8, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00071Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Gene Coburn, v. Civil No. 25-cv-71-JL-TSM Opinion No.

2026 DNH 127

City of Manchester, NH MEMORANDUM ORDER The summary judgement motion in this Fair Labor Standards Act litigation involves the question of whether “on-call” time is compensable under the Act’s definition of “work.”

29 U.S.C. §§ 206-07. Plaintiff Gene Coburn, a retired utilities inspector for the defendant City of Manchester, seeks payment under the FLSA and state law for time he spent “on-call” waiting to respond to emergencies. The city moves for summary judgment on the basis…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API