Legal Opinion

Byford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1949No. A-11040PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants, Harold Eugene Byford and George A. McCully, were jointly charged with the possession of intoxicating liquors by information filed in the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county. A motion to suppress was filed on behalf of each defend ant, but 20 days after filing withdrawn as to Byford. A bearing was bad on tbe motion for McCully, tbe said defendant testified, and both sides introduced evidence, and tbe motion to suppress was by tbe court overruled, and exceptions allowed.

Thereafter, and on December 15, 1947, the case came on for trial, and tbe defendants were tried and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Starr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Heartsill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Bagwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Paty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API