Legal Opinion

Sparico v. Munzenmaier

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 3, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The trial court set aside a verdict for the defendant on the complaint and cross-complaint because of its failure to charge in accordance with the plaintiff’s written request. Its action raises the only question on this appeal.

The action involved cross claims by the owners of cars in collision at an intersection. There was no dispute about the general situation. Eoute 80 in East Haven runs generally east and west. It consists of two concrete strips each ten feet wide, with shoulders. High Street enters it from the southwest at an acute angle but does not cross it. George Lepric, driving the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murray v. KrenzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. Hawley v. RivoltaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  3. Gorham v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Moran v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  5. Estabrook v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. George v. EricsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Fazio v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Scanlon v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Fleischer v. KregelsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. Harewood v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API