Legal Opinion

J. B. Colt Co. v. Watson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.

Trial by jury, verdict and judgment for defendant in a suit brought by the plaintiff for the purchase price of an acetylene generator. Several defenses were set up in the answer: First, a question of fact concerning an acceptance of the contract not involved here. Second, a question of fact concerning whether the plant was delivered in reasonable time; .the written contract setting no date of delivery fixed by law the time written, a reasonable time. Third, a charge that plain tiff was a foreign corporation doing business in Missouri in violation of section 9792, Revised Statutes 1919. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carp v. Queen InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Mathes v. Switzer Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Blake Manufacturing Co. v. JaegerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Frederick v. WilloughbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Superior Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. KemperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Kansas City Bridge Co. v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Yarbrough v. W. A. Gage & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. G. H. Deaton & Co. v. Tarkio Molasses Feed Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API