Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commercial Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1958No. S. F. 19722; S. F. 19723; S. F. 19725Published

1Dissent

SCHAUER, J., Dissenting.

If we follow established law, or even the fundamental principles of our governmental plan, we should hold'that the Public Utilities Commission is without jurisdiction in this matter because it clearly appears that the private mobile radiotelephone operations of the Pacific Telephone Company are not public utility operations. Pacific, by its purported dedication of its private mobile radiotelephone equipment and maintenance service and its filing of a tariff schedule, cannot impart the character of a true public utility into that which is essentially a highly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. ManningSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. General Alarm, Inc. v. UnderdownArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. City of St. Paul v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API