Commercial Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
SCHAUER, J., Dissenting.
If we follow established law, or even the fundamental principles of our governmental plan, we should hold'that the Public Utilities Commission is without jurisdiction in this matter because it clearly appears that the private mobile radiotelephone operations of the Pacific Telephone Company are not public utility operations. Pacific, by its purported dedication of its private mobile radiotelephone equipment and maintenance service and its filing of a tariff schedule, cannot impart the character of a true public utility into that which is essentially a highly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. ManningSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- General Alarm, Inc. v. UnderdownArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- City of St. Paul v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935