Legal Opinion

Atwood v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Edward J. Armstrong and Robert T. Dunlop, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the -13th day of January, 1904, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J. :

This action was originally brought against the First National Bank of the city of New York to recover the amount of a reward offered by that bank for the arrest of a teller of the bank who was a defaulter in a large sum of money. Other claims for this reward having been made, the bank paid the amount offered into court, and the other claimants of the reward were substituted as defendants. The complaint alleges that on or about the 26th day of October, 1900, the First National Bank of the city of New York caused to be published an offer to give to any person a reward of $5,000…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hatch v. MannCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  2. Fitch v. . SnedakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Howland v. . LoundsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. President of City Bank v. BangsNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  5. Fargo v. ArthurNew York Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Rogers v. McCoachNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Rogers v. McCoachNew York Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API