Legal Opinion

Rogers v. McCoach

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to recover a reward.

1Opinion of the CourtMills, J.

This is an action brought to recover the reward offered by the board of supervisors of the county of Orange for information resulting in the apprehension and conviction of the murderers of Frederick and Willis Olney and Alice Ingerick.

The three persons named were murdered in the town of Wallkill, Orange county, on the 6th of October, 1905. Investigations shortly thereafter made indicated that the murders were committed by one Charles H. Rogers, who lived in the city of Middletown in that county. He left home on the morning of the day of the homicide and did not return. On the 16th of January,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hatch v. MannCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  2. People v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Fitch v. . SnedakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Jones v. . the Phoenix BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. President of City Bank v. BangsNew York Court of Chancery · 1833

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Mumbulo v. OrmsbyNew York Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API