Legal Opinion

Barr v. Hudson

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 6, 2020No. 5:20-cv-03272Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS COREY ANDREW BARR, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 20-3272-JWL (fnu) HUDSON, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner, a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, proceeds pro se. The Court has screened the petition under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases, foll. 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and dismisses this matter without prejudice for lack of statutory jurisdiction. Background Petitioner entered a guilty plea in the United States District…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Prost v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Abernathy v. WandesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. Caravalho v. PughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API