Legal Opinion
Lundahl v. Zimmer
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2002No. 01-4105, 01-4139PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The case is, therefore, ordered submitted without oral argument.
Holli Lundahl, proceeding pro se, appeals (1) the district court’s dismissal of her civil action brought against defendants Markus B. Zimmer and Louise York (appeal number 01-4105) and (2) the district court’s subsequent denial of her motions, filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b), to alter, amend, or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Phelps v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- George B. Buchanan, Jr. v. Hugh E. Bowman, IICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Andrews v. HeatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Collins v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Knox v. BlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Schroeder v. KochanowskiDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Oza B. Jenkins v. Clerk of CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.