Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fray v. Omaha World Herald Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1992No. Nos. 91-2439, 91-2443 and 91-2713Published

1DissentHeaney, Senior Circuit Judge

I believe that Georgianna Fray has stated a cause of action against The Omaha World Herald under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. I disagree with the majority on two counts: First, I cannot agree with the conclusion that section 101 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 does not apply in this case; second, even if section 101 did not apply, I would hold that the job of mailroom apprentice for which Fray applied would have created a new and distinct relationship between Fray and the World Herald.

I

I turn first to the issue of whether the Civil Rights Act of 1991 should apply in this case. Fray brought this action…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API