Fray v. Omaha World Herald Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentHeaney, Senior Circuit Judge
I believe that Georgianna Fray has stated a cause of action against The Omaha World Herald under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. I disagree with the majority on two counts: First, I cannot agree with the conclusion that section 101 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 does not apply in this case; second, even if section 101 did not apply, I would hold that the job of mailroom apprentice for which Fray applied would have created a new and distinct relationship between Fray and the World Herald.
I
I turn first to the issue of whether the Civil Rights Act of 1991 should apply in this case. Fray brought this action…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.