Legal Opinion

State v. George

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1927No. 4925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Appellant was charged with and convicted of the crime of interfering with a headgate regulated by a water-master, in violation of the provisions of C. S., sec. 8532, as amended by Sess. Laws 1921, chap. 131, p. 316.

It is urged that the court erred in overruling a demurrer to the information. It has frequently been held by this court that an information or indictment charging a statutory offense substantially in the language of the statute, as was done in this case, is sufficient. (State v. Lundhigh, 30 Ida. 365, 164 Pac. 690, and cases therein cited; State v. McMahon, 37 Ida. 737, 219 Pac.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HoaglandIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State v. O'NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. LundhighIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State v. BrillIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. JurkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FarnsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. BullIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State v. FoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. SedamIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State v. NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API