Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. Todd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1994No. 9415SC212PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

We note at the outset that plaintiff has filed in this Court a motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal. As grounds for the motion, plaintiff contends the following: that defendant (1) failed to provide adequate security for the costs of the appeal; (2) failed to timely contract with the court reporter for production of a transcript; (3) failed to timely serve a properly constituted proposed record on appeal; (4) filed a record on appeal in this Court that violates the Rules of Appellate Procedure; and (5) filed a record on appeal in this Court that was not settled.

Plaintiff further…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Wiseman v. WisemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Coggins v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. HilliardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Jernigan v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Ehrenhaus v. BakerNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
  4. Carter v. Clements Walker PllcNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
  5. Cape Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. S. Destiny, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API