State v. Helmers
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
STREIT, Justice.
Robert Helmers was charged with stalking a woman while subject to a no-contact order. The existence of a no-contact order elevates the crime of stalking from an aggravated misdemeanor to a class “D” felony. Helmers moved to bifurcate the trial so that evidence of the no-contact order would not be presented to the jury unless it first found him guilty of stalking. The district court granted Helmers’ motion, and the State sought interlocutory appeal. We find the district court abused its discretion in bifurcating the trial because the probative value of the no-contact order is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- State v. McKettrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond LindellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- GE Money Bank v. MoralesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Amended July 31, 2015 In RE the Marriage of Susan Michelle Thatcher and Ronald Dean Thatcher Upon the Petition of Susan Michelle Thatcher, Anna Carson as for the Estate of Susan Michelle ThatcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Amended July 31, 2015 In RE the Marriage of Susan Michelle Thatcher and Ronald Dean Thatcher Upon the Petition of Susan Michelle Thatcher, Anna Carson as for the Estate of Susan Michelle ThatcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- In Re the Marriage of Susan Michelle Thatcher and Ronald Dean Thatcher Upon the Petition of Susan Michelle Thatcher, Anna Carson as for the Estate of Susan Michelle ThatcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.